Sunday, April 13, 2008

Widespread condemnation of Dr Binayak Sen’s Solitary Confinement



PRESS RELEASE, 11 April 2008

Health and human rights groups from India and abroad have strongly condemned the unwarranted imposition of solitary confinement on renowned humanitarian activist Dr Binayak Sen by the Chattisgarh government since 15 March 2008 at the Raipur Jail.

Though Dr Sen’s status as a regular prisoner has now been restored, following widespread protests against the move, activists have called for a thorough official investigation of the fact that he was kept in isolation for nearly a month.

Police officials in Raipur have justified their action by claiming Dr Sen was kept in isolation ‘for his own security’ but failed to explain the nature or source of the threat to him as a regular prisoner.

According to a petition signed by hundreds of medical professionals, former colleagues and supporters of Dr Sen (http://www.petitiononline.com/Solitary/petition.html) solitary confinement not only violates the Indian Penal Code but also all axioms of justice and fairplay. Dr Sen has been kept in prison for the past eleven months under the Chattisgarh State Public Security Act, on false charges of aiding outlawed Maoist activity.

“Confining a person of Dr Sen’s stature to solitary confinement is very likely to be seen as vengefulness on the part of agents of the state and an obvious attempt to break the morale of a courageous critic” it said. Along with his work on public health for over three decades Dr Sen was also a human rights activist, being the national Vice President of the Peoples Union of Civil Liberties.

The petition, which calls for Dr Sen’s immediate release, also pointed out that such treatment was completely unwarranted as Dr Sen is an undertrial and not convicted of any crime and even convicted persons are protected by law from any cruel and unusual punishment. Quoting an Amnesty International document on the subject the petition said the imprisonment of a person in total isolation is not acceptable under international human rights standards.

The petitioners also expressed deep concern over the impact of such solitary confinement on the physical and mental health of Dr Sen, who during the course of his imprisonment has already lost much weight according to the jail records.

Dr. Sen is a respected physician much honoured for his self-sacrificing commitment to social causes and his unflinching defense of civil rights. An alumnus of the Christian Medical College and of the Jawaharlal Nehru University, he has received has received many awards for his public service. In December 2007, the Indian Academy of Social Sciences conferred on him the R. R. Keithan Gold Medal, as an “indefatigable defender of human rights and Gandhian social activist of rare courage and dedication”. Currently, he has been nominated for the Jonathan Mann Award 2008, the highest international award for health professionals excelling in human rights activities.

For further information contact:

Satya Sivaraman satyasagar@gmail.com Ph: 9818514952
Sabu George sabumg@vsnl.com Ph: 9810619901

FREE DR BINAYAK SEN CAMPAIGN

Saturday, March 10, 2007

For Your Attention! Important Notice!

Kindly note that the Indian Health Front blogsite has been shifted to a new address www.indianhealthfront.wordpress.com for technical reasons. Any inconvenience caused is regretted and we hope you will continue to visit our site as before.

Editors

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Patent trouble

Sarah Hiddleston (Frontline)

ON January 29, the Madras High Court began hearing arguments on a series of writ petitions filed by the Swiss pharmaceutical multinational Novartis AG and its Indian subsidiary Novartis India against the Indian government, the Cancer Patients Aid Association (CPAA) and four Indian generic drug manufacturers: Natco, Cipla, Hetero and Ranbaxy. The petitions plead against the rejection by the Chennai Patent Office last year of a patent application for Novartis' anti-cancer drug Gleevec and submit that Section 3(d) of the Indian patents Act, Patents Act, 1970, which provided one of several grounds for rejecting the patent application, is invalid, illegal and unconstitutional.

In March 2005, India amended its Patents Act to comply with the 1995 World Trade Organisation's (WTO) Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement, which requires 20-year patent protection for innovative medicines while allowing for public health safeguards. This included Section 3(d), a provision that is unique to Indian law and was included to protect public health. It states that patents would not be given for new forms, uses or minor modifications of existing drugs unless they differ significantly with regard to efficacy.

Between the signing of the 1995 TRIPS agreement and the amendment of the Act, patent applications were collected in a mailbox, to be reviewed once the agreement came into force. One of these was the 1997 application filed by Novartis AG in the Chennai Patent Office for imatinib mesylate, brand-named Gleevec, on the grounds that the beta crystalline salt form (mesylate) of the base imatinib was a new invention. Rights for exclusive access to the Indian market were obtained in 2003, and on that basis manufacturers of generic drugs were forced to withdraw their product from the market.

For More See......... http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/stories/20070223003713100.htm

Labels:

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Bhopal Union Carbide victims still suffer

BHOPAL (PTI Sunday, January 28, 2007) Inadequate research on ill effects of methyl iso-cynate (MIC) on Bhopal gas tragedy victims seems to have proved to be a stumbling block in their treatment even as newer areas of study continue to evolve due to fresh predicaments faced by people living around the Union Carbide factory.

Tissues and foetuses have been preserved by Madhya Pradesh Medico-legal Institute for further research, but no organisation appears to be 'sensitive' towards conducting studies.

"Vital information about the effect of MIC on foetus, chromosomal
aberration and genetic fallout could be collected through studies on 25 foetuses voluntarily preserved for research after the tragedy in 1984," institute Director DK Satpathy said.

Ironically, no scientist or organisation has come forward for the
research despite request letters sent to several institutes, including
the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR), he said.

For more…… http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1076636

Monday, January 29, 2007

A New Front for India's Health



Health is as much a political as a medical issue and it is time Indian political organizations gave top priority to public health issues in their work.

This was among the conclusions arrived at by a meeting of activists who in Chennai to discuss ways to change the dire situation of public health in the country.

The meeting was the first in a series of consultations being undertaken in different parts of the country as a step towards the formation of the Indian Health Front, a broad coalition of activists and organizations working on both health and related political issues.

Similar consultations are planned to be held in Bangalore, Kolkota, New Delhi, Chandigarh, Mumbai culminating in a national conference in Bhopal on 3 December 2007, the 23rd anniversary of the Bhopal gas disaster.

A wide range of issues related to the public health situation in the country were raised by participants, who were mostly from Tamil Nadu but also from Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.

Starting off the meeting Amal, one of the organizers, said that the challenges of solving problems of public health in the world's second most populous country with development indicators often worse than sub-Saharan Africa were immense. He explained that the idea of setting up the Indian Health Front was not to compete with any existing organizations but to add more hands to take up the huge tasks ahead and add a radical political direction to the movement.

The Indian Health Front he said would try to network all those interested in working on such issues in an open and non-sectarian manner.

Amal also emphasized that apart from addressing health policy and its proper implementation the new front would also try to make direct interventions in the community to tackle public health problems. There was a need today, he said, to build new traditions of social solidarity, mutual cooperation and compassion in Indian society.

Geeta Ramakrishnan, veteran labour and women's rights activist, spoke about the health problems of the urban poor and said that the Indian State had completely failed to meet their needs. In particular, she pointed out that unorganized labour, which formed over 90 percent of the country's workforce, had little or no health care at all. The State, instead of taking care of their health needs was busy privatizing healthcare and making it unaffordable for ordinary people.

Dr Rakhal Gaitonde spoke about the situation of health care in rural areas and said that the situation of infant and maternal mortality or access to health facilities was dismal even in a state like Tamil Nadu, which was relatively better compared to other parts of the country.

Abhay Shukla, Convenor, Jan Swasthya Abhiyan gave an overview of the campaign's history, activities and key objectives. The JSA is a campaign launched in 2000 jointly by 18 national networks working on health and related issues.

According to him from the experience of the JSA there were five important tasks ahead of the public health movement, namely:

• Making health a sustained mass issue
• Developing an overarching strategy to deal with problems of both public and private health systems
• Developing an integrated set of demands on health care and its social and economic determinants
• Carrying out constructive health service delivery work and building models that can be the basis for demanding a new approach to health issues
• Developing transitional demands which can be demanded with justification today but which would also take us towards a new system tomorrow

Dr Srinivasan of Medico Friends Circle said that the crisis of healthcare delivery services in India had deepened in the last thirty years. He gave an overview of the history of the MFC, which was formed in 1975 and its regular activities.

G.Ananthakrishnan presented a paper on the potential for introducing a universal health insurance in India. Dr Padma Balasubramaniam and Pratyush Bharati made presentations on the experience of Cuba's health care system and the changes being brought about in the health sector by Hugo Chavez's Venezuela.

In the discussions that followed participants pointed out that the health status of the population was closely linked to the social, economic, cultural and political situation in the country. Poverty, manifested in the form of low income, malnutrition, lack of drinking water and poor access to energy sources it was pointed out was the biggest disease in itself as well as the cause of most health problems.

Caste and gender discrimination, the commercialization of medical education and the lack of health facilities in rural areas were also major reasons for the poor status of health in India. In recent years, the advent of neo-liberal economic policies has compounded the problems of public health in the country by creating huge income inequalities, giving a free rein to multinationals that operated polluting industries and marginalizing people who depended on agriculture for survival.

Some participants said that the problem of impunity of multinationals, exemplified by Union Carbide (and its successor Dow Chemicals) of Bhopal gas tragedy notoriety, was only bound to get worse in the days ahead.

Apart from low investments in public health infrastructure a major problem was the poor maintenance of existing facilities and lack of implementation of announced policies. And in this situation the Indian State was washing its hands off its responsibilities by encouraging corporations to take over the health sector.

Some participants also emphasized the need not to 'medicalise' the public health system and create too much dependence on doctors, hospitals and pharmaceuticals. Instead it was suggested to help people take care of their own health in various ways, including through the use of traditional systems of medicine in the country.

Manohar of Sangama, Bangalore told participants about the various problems of discrimination, violence and lack of access to healthcare faced by sexual minorities in India.

Among the suggestions for activities to be taken up as part of the Indian Health Front's activities were:
• Campaign for free healthcare and social security for all
• Campaigning for greater State investment in basic rural and urban infrastructure such as water, energy and sanitation
• Setting up citizen's health committees at various levels to monitor public health.
• Organising healthcare workers
• Studying impact of globalization on public health
• Creating a national rural health network
• Fighting against privatization of medical education
• Working together with other organisations in the health movement